Security Screening Act (SicherheitsÜberprüfungsGesetz – SÜG) – Germany Tightens Security Screening Law to Combat Espionage and Sabotage
The German Federal Ministry of the Interior (BMI) has proposed an amendment to the Security Screening Act (SicherheitsÜberprüfungsGesetz – SÜG) to enhance protection against espionage and sabotage in government agencies and critical infrastructure.
Key points of the proposed legislation include:
- Stricter security checks: Employees in security-sensitive areas will undergo more rigorous and effective screening processes.
- Enhanced preventive measures: The bill expands mandatory screening measures for personnel sabotage prevention, particularly in IT and communication technology sectors of federal authorities and critical infrastructure.
- Increased online scrutiny: The Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution will conduct more thorough internet research to identify potential extremist activities and statements, including social media checks.
- Digitalization of the process: The security screening procedure will be further digitized to increase efficiency and speed.
Federal Interior Minister Nancy Faeser emphasized the heightened threat to democracy from espionage and sabotage, stating, “To reduce security risks, we must scrutinize more closely whom we entrust with important tasks and confidential information in security-relevant areas of the state and our critical infrastructures.”
European Approaches to Terrorist and Extremist Screening
While Germany is taking steps to enhance its security screening processes, other European countries have varying approaches to identifying and monitoring potential threats:
- EU-wide measures: The European Union has established a framework for information sharing and cooperation among member states. This includes the Schengen Information System (SIS), which allows police and border guards to share alerts on wanted or missing persons and objects.
- Passenger Name Record (PNR) directive: Implemented in 2016, this EU-wide measure regulates the transfer and processing of personal data provided by air passengers, enhancing the ability to track potential threats.
- European Counter Terrorism Centre: Created in 2016 at Europol, this center supports information exchange between national police authorities.
- Fragmented approach: Despite EU-wide initiatives, each European country maintains its own terrorist watch list with unique standards for tracking terrorists. This fragmentation has been a point of concern for U.S. counterterrorism officials.
- Underutilization of shared resources: According to U.S. Terrorist Screening Center Director Christopher Piehota, some European countries do not fully utilize the terror tracking tools and data provided by the United States.
- Challenges in the Schengen Zone: The 26 European countries within the Schengen area do not perform routine border checks, which can complicate efforts to track potential threats moving between countries.
- Privacy concerns: Some European countries face challenges in implementing more comprehensive screening measures due to privacy concerns. For instance, the sharing of passenger information has been a topic of debate in the European Parliament for years.
Security Screening Act (SicherheitsÜberprüfungsGesetz – SÜG) – effectiveness depends on implementation
The proposed German legislation aims to address some of these challenges by enhancing screening processes and increasing digital scrutiny. However, the effectiveness of these measures will depend on their implementation and coordination with other European and international partners.
As the threat landscape continues to evolve, European countries face the ongoing challenge of balancing security needs with privacy concerns and civil liberties. The German proposal represents one approach to this complex issue, and its implementation may provide insights for other nations grappling with similar security challenges.
How the F.B.I. of the USA is tackling the issue, is shown here.
All content on terrorism can be found here.
