Long time ago - Western countries cut aid and support internationally- with global impact on health and security
In 2025, the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) has undergone an unprecedented reduction in personnel and funding. Over 20,000 American jobs have been lost by September alone due to a sweeping Stop-Work Order that defunded more than 80% of USAID’s global health and development programs. This drastic reduction is not limited to staff based in the U.S.; thousands of employees working abroad on critical aid projects have also faced layoffs and contract cancellations. The move abruptly interrupted life-saving assistance programs worldwide and devastated communities that depended on continuous support. The cuts represent billions of dollars withdrawn from international aid commitments, significantly undermining U.S. global leadership and national security efforts.
A similar trend of personnel downsizing affects Western aid agencies beyond the U.S.: The Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ), which oversees Germany’s development aid, has had to cut approximately 15% of its personnel over the past year, corresponding to a reduction of nearly 1,200 employees from around 8,000 total staff. These cuts impact program management and field operations, delaying project implementation worldwide. Similar in the United Kingdom: The Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO) reduced its development aid staff by about 20% between 2023 and 2025, trimming roughly 1,400 positions from its former count of 7,000 employees. The scaling back was driven by austerity budgets and a strategic focus on defense spending over development cooperation. Also the French Development Agency (AFD) has seen a 10% reduction in personnel, equating to about 500 fewer staff members from a total of 5,000. Budget pressures and political recalibrations toward geo-economic priorities have led to delayed or downsized projects. Last, but not least, Italy’s Agency for Development Cooperation has cut around 300 positions, approximately 18% of its workforce of 1,700, consistent with budgetary constraints and shifting governmental priorities. These reductions collectively weaken European contributions to global development and humanitarian responses, exacerbating capacity shortfalls in critical regions
Widespread Consequences for Global Health and Development
The dismantling of such programs and personnel has led to termination or suspension of thousands of projects worldwide. Vital initiatives in countries such as Ukraine, Ethiopia, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Kenya, and many others have been halted. For example, Ukraine experienced aid cuts valued at approximately $1.4 billion solely from the U.S., while other nations have seen reductions that represent significant portions of their local economies and healthcare systems. The cessation of programs impacts areas like HIV treatment, education, nutrition, and disaster response, threatening decades of development progress and potentially costing millions of lives. Researchers estimate that if these funding cuts persist, over 14 million lives could be lost by 2030 from preventable causes due to the collapse of essential health and social services.
Similar Cuts in Other Western Countries and International Organizations
The downsizing trend is not exclusive to the U.S. Other Western nations have implemented austerity measures that similarly reduce personnel and budgets in their foreign aid agencies. European countries have faced budget pressures that led to cuts in contributions to development programs and humanitarian relief. The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), facing its own financial shortfalls, recently announced staff cuts exceeding 25% to cope with funding gaps, directly impacting its capacity to assist millions of displaced persons worldwide.
Such reductions jeopardize the continuity and quality of international humanitarian efforts, weaken development partnerships, and endanger vulnerable populations. The cumulative effect across these agencies represents a contraction of global aid capacity during a period of rising complex humanitarian crises.
Political Decisions and Their Human Cost
The sharp personnel reductions and program suspensions result largely from political decisions prioritizing domestic budgetary constraints and shifting foreign aid priorities. Detractors of foreign aid programs argue they are inefficient or serve ideological agendas, despite overwhelming evidence that these investments save lives and promote global stability at a relatively low cost to taxpayers. The cuts not only impact the livelihoods of tens of thousands of aid workers but also erode decades of trust, goodwill, and progress in partner countries.
Experts warn that reversing these trends is urgent to avoid a humanitarian backslide with wide-reaching geopolitical consequences. Sustained political will and funding are critical to maintain the capacity of agencies like USAID and UNHCR to respond effectively to ongoing and emerging crises around the globe.
About The Author
